Advertisement

“Who am I to disagree?” A qualitative study of how patients interpret the consent process prior to manual therapy of the cervical spine

      Abstract

      Background

      Clinical practice standards dictate a requirement for osteopaths to gain informed consent prior to any examination or treatment. Despite previous research on adverse events, communication and patient preferences, no published studies were identified that looked qualitatively at patients experiences of informed consent. This study aimed to explore patient perceptions of the consent process in a student-led osteopathy clinic.

      Methods

      Semi-structured interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of seven patients attending a student osteopathy clinic. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and constructivist grounded theory was used as a framework for data collection, conceptualisation and analysis.

      Results

      One core theme was identified to highlight participants' perception of a hierarchical power-divide. Three further themes were constructed to illustrate perceived key influencers of the consent experience: commitment to symptom resolution; lack of knowledge and; unwilling to cause friction.

      Conclusions

      Patients’ experiences of consent were unified through the core theme of situational disempowerment, questioning the efficacy of current informed consent processes. This study has implications for further research into patient and practitioner perceptions and highlights a need for additional training and reflection on existing communication strategies and consent practices.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Copnell G.
        Informed consent in physiotherapy practice: it is not what is said but how it is said.
        Physiotherapy. 2018; 104: 67-71
        • Sim J.
        Informed consent: ethical implications for physiotherapy.
        Physiotherapy. 1986; 72: 584-587
        • Kadam R.A.
        Informed consent process: a step further towards making it meaningful!.
        Perspect Clin Res. 2017; 8: 107-112
        • General Osteopathic Council
        Osteopathic practice standards.
        ([Internet]) General Osteopathic Council, 2018 ([cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from:)
        • General Chiropractic Council
        The Code Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for chiropractors.
        ([Internet]) General Chiropractic Council, 2016 ([cited 2020 May 24]. Available from:)
        • Osteopathy Board of Australia
        Code of Conduct for registered health practitioners.
        ([Internet]) Osteopathy Board of Australia, 2014 ([cited 2020 May 24]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/Meghan/Downloads/Osteopathy-Board---Code-of-conduct.PDF)
        • Australian Chiropractors Association
        Code of ethics.
        ([Internet]) Australian Chiropractors Association, 2017 ([cited 2020 May 29]. Available from:)
        • Hall D.E.
        • Prochazka A.V.
        • Fink A.S.
        Informed consent for clinical treatment.
        CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J). 2012; 184: 533-540
        • General Osteopathic Council
        Consent guidance for osteopaths practising in England and Wales.
        ([Internet]) General Osteopathic Council, 2015 ([cited 2020 May 24]. Available from:)
        • Manson N.C.
        • O'Neill O.
        Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York2007
        • Cave E.
        Valid consent to medical treatment.
        Journal of Medical Ethics Published Online First. 2020; (23 June)
        • Rushton A.
        • Carlesso L.C.
        • Flynn T.
        • Hing W.A.
        • Kerry R.
        • Rubinstein S.M.
        • et al.
        International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of vascular pathologies of the neck prior to orthopaedic manual therapy (OMT) intervention: international IFOMPT cervical framework.
        2020
        • Carnes D.
        • Mullinger B.
        • Underwood M.
        Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study.
        Man Ther. 2010; 15: 2-6
        • Swait G.
        • Finch R.
        What are the risks of manual treatment of the spine? A scoping review for clinicians.
        Chiropr Man Ther. 2017; 25: 37
        • Paanalahti K.
        • Holm L.W.
        • Nordin M.
        • Asker M.
        • Lyander J.
        • Skillgate E.
        Adverse events after manual therapy among patients seeking care for neck and/or back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
        BMC Muscoskel Disord. 2014; 15: 77
        • Probst P.
        • Grummich K.
        • Heger P.
        • Zaschke S.
        • Knebel P.
        • Ulrich A.
        • et al.
        Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study.
        Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 48
        • Coulter I.D.
        • Crawford C.
        • Hurwitz E.L.
        • Vernon H.
        • Khorsan R.
        • Suttorp Booth M.
        • et al.
        Manipulation and mobilization for treating chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Spine J. 2018; 18: 866-879
        • Vogel s
        • Mars T.
        • Keeping S.
        • Barton T.
        • Marlin N.
        • Froud R.
        • et al.
        The CROaM study - clinical risk osteopathy and management summary report.
        ([Internet])2014 ([cited 2020 May 24]. Available from:)
        • Nielsen S.M.
        • Tarp S.
        • Christensen R.
        • Bliddal H.
        • Klokker L.
        • Henriksen M.
        The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews.
        Syst Rev. 2017; 6: 64
        • Søndenå P.
        • Dalusio-King G.
        • Hebron C.
        Conceptualisation of the therapeutic alliance in physiotherapy: is it adequate?.
        Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2020; : 102131
        • Naik G.
        • Ahmed H.
        • Edwards A.G.
        Communicating risk to patients and the public.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62: 213-216
        • Ahmed H.
        • Naik G.
        • Willoughby H.
        • Edwards A.G.K.
        Communicating risk.
        BMJ. 2012; 344e3996
        • Ashraff S.
        • Malawa G.
        • Dolan T.
        • Khanduja V.
        Prospective randomised controlled trial on the role of patient information leaflets in obtaining informed consent.
        ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76: 139-141
        • Daniels G.
        • Vogel S.
        Consent in osteopathy: a cross sectional survey of patients' information and process preferences.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2012; 15: 92-102
        • Leach J.
        • Mandy A.
        • Hankins M.
        • Ives R.
        • Cross V.
        • Cage M.
        • et al.
        Communicating risks of treatment and informed consent in osteopathic practice: a literature review and pilot focus groups.
        ([Internet]) NCOR, 2011 (Available from:)
        • Paling J.
        Strategies to help patients understand risks.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 745-748
        • Carlesso L.C.
        • Cairney J.
        • Dolovich L.
        • Hoogenes J.
        Defining adverse events in manual therapy: an exploratory qualitative analysis of the patient perspective.
        Man Ther. 2011; 16: 440-446
        • Rajendran D.
        • Bright P.
        • Bettles S.
        • Carnes D.
        • Mullinger B.
        What puts the adverse in “adverse events”? Patients' perceptions of post-treatment experiences in osteopathy--a qualitative study using focus groups.
        Man Ther. 2012; 17: 305-311
        • Funabashi M.
        • Carlesso L.C.
        Symptoms patients receiving manual therapy experienced and perceived as adverse: a secondary analysis of a survey of patients' perceptions of what constitutes an adverse response.
        Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. Taylor & Francis. 2020; (0): 1-8
        • Habiba M.A.
        Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship.
        J Med Ethics. 2000; 26: 183-187
        • Dunn M.
        At the moral margins of the doctor–patient relationship.
        J Med Ethics. 2019; 45: 149-150
        • Tong A.
        • Sainsbury P.
        • Craig J.
        Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349-357
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing grounded theory.
        second ed. Sage, London; Thousand Oaks, Calif2014
        • Bryant A.
        Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: pragmatism in research practice.
        Oxford University Press, New York, NY2017
        • Thomson O.P.
        • Petty N.J.
        • Scholes J.
        Grounding osteopathic research – introducing grounded theory.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2014; 17: 167-186
        • Bryant A.
        • Charmaz K.
        SAGE HANDBOOK OF GROUNDED THEORY. Place of publication not identified.
        SAGE PUBLICATIONS, 2018
        • Kvale S.
        Doing interviews.
        1 edition. SAGE Publications, London2007
        • Lincoln Y.S.
        • Guba E.G.
        Naturalistic inquiry.
        SAGE, 1985
        • King N.
        • Horrocks C.
        Interviews in qualitative research.
        SAGE, 2010
        • Birt L.
        • Scott S.
        • Cavers D.
        • Campbell C.
        • Walter F.
        Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?.
        Qual Health Res. 2016; 26: 1802-1811
        • Foley G.
        • Timonen V.
        Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences.
        Health Serv Res. 2015; 50: 1195-1210
        • Glaser B.G.
        Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory.
        first ed. The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, Calif1978
        • Dey I.
        Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry.
        Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 1999
        • O'Reilly M.
        • Parker N.
        ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research.
        Qual Res. 2013; 13: 190-197
        • Mason M.
        Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research.
        ([Internet])2010 ([cited 2020 Jan 27];11. Available from:)
        • Maher C.
        • Hadfield M.
        • Hutchings M.
        • de Eyto A.
        Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: a design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods.
        Int J Qual Methods. 2018; 17 (1609406918786362)
        • Birks M.
        • Mills J.
        Grounded theory: a practical guide.
        second ed. SAGE, Los Angeles2015
        • The World Medical Association
        Wma declaration OF helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.
        ([Internet]) The World Medical Association, 2013 ([cited 2020 May 24]. Available from:)
        • Coyne I.T.
        Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?.
        J Adv Nurs. 1997; 26: 623-630
        • Wallerstein N.
        Powerlessness, empowerment, and health: implications for health promotion programs.
        Am J Health Promot. 1992; 6: 197-205
        • Powers T.L.
        • Bendall D.
        Improving health outcomes through patient empowerment.
        J Hosp Market Publ Relat. 2003; 15: 45-59
        • Anderson R.M.
        • Funnell M.M.
        • Butler P.M.
        • Arnold M.S.
        • Fitzgerald J.T.
        • Feste C.C.
        Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
        Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 943-949
        • Salmon P.
        • Young B.
        Dependence and caring in clinical communication: the relevance of attachment and other theories.
        Patient Educ Counsel. 2009; 74: 331-338
        • Information NC for B
        • Pike USNL of M 8600 R
        • MD B
        • Usa 20894
        Patient empowerment and health care.
        ([Internet]) World Health Organization, 2009 ([cited 2020 Feb 7]. Available from:)
        • Barr P.J.
        • Scholl I.
        • Bravo P.
        • Faber M.J.
        • Elwyn G.
        • McAllister M.
        Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.
        PloS One. 2015; 10e0126553
        • Dowdle D.
        • Codyre D.
        Transforming patient engagement to take charge of their health and wellbeing.
        Int J Integrated Care. 2017; 17 (28–28)
        • Tyreman S.
        An expert in what?: the need to clarify meaning and expectations in “The Expert Patient.”.
        Med Health Care Philos. 2005; 8: 153-157
        • Mead N.
        • Bower P.
        Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature.
        Patient Educ Counsel. 2002; 48: 51-61
        • Lancet T.
        Patient empowerment—who empowers whom?.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 1677
        • Kaba R.
        • Sooriakumaran P.
        The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship.
        Int J Surg. 2007; 5: 57-65
        • Tyreman S.
        Evidence, alternative facts and narrative: a personal reflection on person-centred care and the role of stories in healthcare.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2018; 28: 1-3
        • Peerbhoy D.
        • Hall G.M.
        • Parker C.
        • Shenkin A.
        • Salmon P.
        Patients' reactions to attempts to increase passive or active coping with surgery.
        Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47: 595-601
        • Coulter A.
        Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.
        BMJ. 1999; 319: 719-720
        • Salmon P.
        • Young B.
        Core assumptions and research opportunities in clinical communication.
        Patient Educ Counsel. 2005; 58: 225-234
        • Hoffmann T.C.
        • Lewis J.
        • Maher C.G.
        Shared decision making should be an integral part of physiotherapy practice.
        Physiotherapy. 2020; 107: 43-49
        • Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
        ([Internet], [cited 2020 Oct 2]. Available from:)
        • Staniszewska S.
        • Boardman F.
        • Gunn L.
        • Palmer J.
        • Clay D.
        • Seers K.
        • et al.
        Thematic qualitative review: scoping report.
        ([Internet]) Royal College of Physicians (UK), 2012 ([cited 2020 Feb 9]. Available from:)
        • Hardavella G.
        • Aamli-Gaagnat A.
        • Frille A.
        • Saad N.
        • Niculescu A.
        • Powell P.
        Top tips to deal with challenging situations: doctor–patient interactions.
        Breathe. 2017; 13: 129-135
        • Birkhäuer J.
        • Gaab J.
        • Kossowsky J.
        • Hasler S.
        • Krummenacher P.
        • Werner C.
        • Gerger H.
        Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis.
        PloS One. 2017; 12 (p.e0170988)
        • Francis R.
        Report of the mid staffordshire NHS foundation trust public inquiry.
        ([Internet]) The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, Stafford, UK2013 (Available from:)
        • Krishnamurti T.
        • Argo N.
        A patient-centered approach to informed consent: results from a survey and randomized trial.
        Med Decis Making. 2016; 36: 726-740
        • Satyanarayana Rao K.H.
        Informed consent: an ethical obligation or legal compulsion?.
        J Cutan Aesthetic Surg. 2008; 1: 33-35
        • National Clinical Guideline C (UK)
        Enabling patients to actively participate in their care.
        ([Internet]) Royal College of Physicians (UK), 2012 ([cited 2020 Feb 9]. Available from:)
        • Gillon R.
        Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.
        BMJ. 1994; 309: 184-188
        • Swift T.
        Desperation may affect autonomy but not informed consent.
        AJOB Neurosci. 2011; 2: 45-46
        • Dunn L.B.
        • Holtzheimer P.E.
        • Hoop J.G.
        • Mayberg H.S.
        • Appelbaum P.S.
        Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: focus on risk and consent.
        AJOB Neurosci. 2011; 2: 29-36
        • Vaughan B.
        • Morrison T.
        Assessment in the final year clinical practicum of an Australian osteopathy program.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2015; 18: 278-286
        • Mead N.
        • Bower P.
        Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.
        Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51: 1087-1110
        • Engel G.L.
        The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model.
        Am J Psychiatr. 1980; 137: 535-544
        • Austin Z.
        • Christensen-Moore C.
        • Walsh J.
        Preventing small problems from becoming big problems in health and care.
        ([Internet], Available from:)
        • McGivern G.
        • Fischer M.
        • Palaima T.
        • Spendlove Z.
        • Thomson O.
        • Waring J.
        Exploring and explaining the dynamics of osteopathic regulation, professionalism and compliance with standards in practice.
        ([Internet], Available from:)
        • Carnes D.
        What can osteopaths learn from concerns and complaints raised against them? A review of insurance and regulator reports.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2016; 22 (Elsevier): 3-10
        • Carnes D.
        Types of concerns raised about osteopaths and osteopathic services in 2013.
        ([Internet]) National Council for Osteopathic Research, 2014 (Available from:)
        • Grimm P.
        Social desirability bias.
        Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing [Internet]. American Cancer Society, 2010 ([cited 2020 Feb 9]. Available from:)
        • McCambridge J.
        • Bruin M de
        • Witton J.
        The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review.
        PloS One. 2012; 7e39116
        • Nederhof A.J.
        Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review.
        Eur J Soc Psychol. 1985; 15: 263-280
        • Alfidi R.J.
        Controversy, alternatives, and decisions in complying with the legal doctrine of informed consent.
        Radiology. 1975; 114: 231-234
        • Gossman W.
        • Thornton I.
        • Hipskind J.E.
        Informed consent. StatPearls.
        ([Internet]) StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)2020 ([cited 2020 Feb 9]. Available from:)