Advertisement

State of affairs of osteopathy in the Benelux: Benelux Osteosurvey 2013

  • Patrick L.S. van Dun
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.Commission for Osteopathic Research, Practice and Promotion vzw (CORPP); Kon. Astridlaan 148/002, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium. Tel.: +32 499 725 637.
    Affiliations
    Commission for Osteopathic Research, Practice and Promotion vzw (CORPP), Kon. Astridlaan 148/002, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium

    Research Division, C.O.ME. Collaboration, Kon. Astridlaan 148/002, 2800 Mechelen, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mioara Alina Nicolaie
    Affiliations
    Ghent University, Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Arnout Van Messem
    Affiliations
    Ghent University, Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 16, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2016.01.003

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The Commission for Osteopathic Research, Practice and Promotion (CORPP) and the Stichting Wetenschappelijk Osteopathisch Onderzoek (SWOO) identified the need to gather data about the practice profile of osteopaths in Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (together called the Benelux), to obtain actual figures regarding the profession to guide strategic planning concerning its promotion and future research projects.

      Methods

      All Benelux osteopaths who could be contacted (n = 2050) were invited to complete an online questionnaire survey between December 20, 2012 and March 26, 2013. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data; specific research questions were tested using linear regression and proportional odds models. Results from previous national and international surveys of specific groups in the osteopathic profession were used for comparative analysis.

      Results

      The response rate was 52.15% (n = 1069). Almost one third of the respondents were female. The mean time since graduation was 11 years. The vast majority of respondents were self-employed and in private practice (91.94%, n = 935); one third worked in a group practice (33.82%, n = 344). They consult an average of 9 patients a day (37.7 patients a week) and the majority spend between 46 and 60 min with a new patient (50.51%, n = 498) and between 30 and 45 min with a returning patient (64.20%, n = 633). Practice working hours are on average 29.7 per week. The most commonly used diagnostic techniques are: inspection, palpation of position/structure and of movement. Only 2.43% (n = 24) of the respondents do not make a diagnosis with every consultation and the vast majority formulate a differential diagnosis before deciding to treat a patient (90.06%, n = 888). The most commonly used treatment techniques are: visceral manipulation, neuro- and viscerocranial techniques and general osteopathic mobilisations. Most common complaints by body region estimated by the respondents were the lumbar spine, cervical spine and pelvis. Respondents also estimated that patients were mostly self-referred.

      Conclusions

      The results provide a benchmark for some aspects of osteopathic service delivery, which may inform potential purchasers of healthcare services; they also provide a baseline for estimating growth and scope of practice in the Benelux. Further research is required to enhance the validity of information about reported patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Osteopathic International Alliance (OIA)
        Osteopathy and osteopathic medicine: a global view of practice, patients.
        Education and the Contribution to Healthcare Delivery, Chicago2013
      1. International osteopathic research network http://wp.oialliance.org/international-osteopathic-research-network [accessed 01.12.14].

        • General Osteopathic Council
        Snapshot survey 2001.
        GOsC. 2001; (Available at)
        • General Osteopathic Council
        Osteopaths' opinion survey.
        GOsC. 2012; (Available at:)
        • Vogel S.
        • Herrick R.
        Service delivery characteristics of UK osteopaths – a cross sectional survey.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2008; 11: 153
        • Jamison J.R.
        Osteopathy in Australia.
        Aust J Osteopat. 1991; 3: 24-29
        • Orrock P.J.
        Profile of members of the Australian osteopathic association: part 1 – the practitioners.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2009; 12: 14-24
        • Orrock P.J.
        Profile of members of the Australian osteopathic association: part 2 – the patients.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2009; 12: 128-139
        • Chauvin M.
        • Gouyot M.
        • Landurier G.
        • Lemaire D.
        L'observatoire socio-economique de l'ostéopathie.
        2009 ([accessed 06.08.14])
        • Landurier G.
        • Bézard L.
        • Drumare J.-E.
        • Chauvin M.
        • Lemaire D.
        Raport OSEOstéo Ostéopathes Exclusifs.
        2012 (OSEOstéo – Etude OE 2012)
        • KPMG
        How do osteopaths practice? London.
        GOsC. 2011; ([accessed 06.08.14])
        • Fawkes C.
        • Leach J.
        • Mathias S.
        • Moore A.
        The Standardised data collection project – standardised data collection within osteopathic practice in the UK: development and first use of a tool to profile osteopathic care in 2009.
        National Council for Osteopathic Research (NCOR), LondonJune 2010 ([accessed 06.08.14])
        • Burke S.R.
        • Myers R.
        • Zhang A.L.
        A profile of osteopathic practice in Australia 2010–2011: a cross sectional survey.
        Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14: 227
        • Dubois T.
        • Coatmellec J.
        • Berthiller J.
        • Landurier G.
        Osteopathy in France: a demographic and epidemiological descriptive analysis of French osteopaths patients.
        Osteopathic Teaching: Competencies, Education, Evaluation, OIA, Paris, France2012
        • Licciardone J.C.
        • Kearns C.M.
        • Ruggiere P.
        Background and methodology of the Osteopathic Survey of Health Care in America 2010 (OSTEOSURV 2010).
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011; 111 ([accessed 06.08.14]): 670-684
      2. Forum for Osteopathic Regulation in Europe (FORE), Regulation http://www.forewards.eu/regulation/ [accessed 30.04.15].

        • De Gendt T.
        • Desomer A.
        • Goossens M.
        • Hanquet G.
        • Léonard C.
        • Mélard F.
        • et al.
        Stand van zaken voor de osteopathie en de chiropraxie in België. Health Services Research (HSR).
        Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE), Brussel2010 (KCE Reports 148A. D/2010/10.273/91)
        • R Development Core Team
        R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2010
        • Drieskens S.
        Contacten met beoefenaars van niet-conventionele geneeswijzen.
        in: Drieskens S. Gisle L. Gezondheidsenquête 2013. Rapport 3: Gebruik van gezondheids- en welzijnsdiensten. WIV-ISP, Brussel2015
      3. General osteopathic council statistics, http://www.osteopathy.org.uk/resources/Research-and-surveys/Statistics/ [accessed 06.08.14].

      4. van Dun P.L.S., Mens M., Van den Berghe W., Hermans B. (red.), Informatiedocument Osteopathie, Brussel, 2013, Groepering Nationaal en Representatief van de Professionele Osteopaten vzw (GNRPO vzw) en Register voor de Osteopaten van België (R.O.B.), pp. 8–10

        • Cotton A.
        Osteopathic principles in the modern world.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2013; 16: 17-24
        • van Dun P.L.S.
        • Wagner C.
        Die Identität der Osteopathie in Europa.
        Osteopat Med. 2012; 4: 22-26
        • Wagner C.
        Exploring European osteopathic identity: an analysis of the professional websites of European osteopathic organizations.
        Wiener Schule für Osteopathie, Wien2009 (Master thesis) ([accessed 06.08.14])
        • Riermeier R.
        Eine empirische Studie zum beruflichen Selbstverständnis von Osteopathinnen und deren Einstellung zur gesetzlichen Anerkennung der Osteopathie.
        Wiener Schule für Osteopathie, Wien2011 (Master thesis) ([accessed 06.08.14])
      5. Bundesverband osteopathie.
        Auswert Osteopat. 2013; ([accessed 06.08.14])
      6. http://www.fico.be/be/De_opleiding/ [accessed 10.08.15].

      7. Nederlandse Vereniging voor Osteopathie; College van Advies, Hilversum en Stichting het Nederlands Register voor Osteopathie, Beroepscompetentieprofiel Osteopathie, Emmeloord, 2009, p.14-15 http://osteopathie-nro.nl/pdf/Beroepscompetentieprofiel.pdf [accessed 10.08.15].

        • van Dun P.L.S.
        De wereld is aan de osteopaten en Icarus was een osteopaat.
        About Osteopat. 2010; 5: 17-21
        • McGrath M.C.
        A global view of osteopathic practice – mirror or echo chamber?.
        Int J Osteopath Med. 2015; 18: 130-140
        • Bear H.A.
        The divergent evolution of osteopathy in America and Britain.
        Soc Sci Med. 1984; 19: 717-725
        • Tüffers C.
        Osteopathisches Patientenprofil in Bezug auf das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland. Umfrage 2009.
        Diplomarbeit, Hamburg2010