Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 24-30 (March 2010)


View previous. 6 of 11 View next.

Composite sacroiliac joint pain provocation tests: A question of clinical significance

M.C. McGrathCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 25 March 2009; received in revised form 18 May 2009; accepted 2 June 2009. published online 25 August 2009.

Abstract 

True sacroiliac (SI) joint pain arises for well-established pathological reasons. For example, SI joint infection is characterised by non-specific, diffuse and poorly localised pain that makes an initial clinical diagnosis difficult, even though the condition is a prima facie SI joint lesion. On the other hand, the putative sacroiliac joint pain of the ‘sacroiliac joint syndrome’ that is by definition not associated with morphological and radiological abnormality, is a symptom commonly observed in clinical practice. Such a presentation possesses a typically well-localisable pain in the region overlying the posterior sacroiliac joint. The contention is that composite SI joint pain provocation tests, whilst of arguably statistical ‘significance’, may lack clinical significance particularly in the light of anatomical research that presents an alternative patho-anatomic basis for localisable sacroiliac pain and may offer a rational basis for diagnosis and treatment.

Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Otago School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Corresponding Author InformationDunedin Osteopathic Clinic Ltd., 483 George Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. Tel./fax: +64 3 477 7020.

PII: S1746-0689(09)00048-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2009.06.002


View previous. 6 of 11 View next.

Advertisement