International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 121-127, December 2009

Preliminary investigation of a measure of dysfunctional breathing symptoms: The Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire (SEBQ)

  • Rosalba Courtney

      Affiliations

    • School Health Science, RMIT University, 11 Binburra Ave, Avalon, NSW 2107, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 99183460.
    • RC planned this research, collected data and performed initial statistical analysis.
  • ,
  • Kenneth M. Greenwood

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
    • KMG contributed to statistical analysis, writing and revision of the manuscript.

Received 10 September 2008; received in revised form 15 December 2008; accepted 9 February 2009. published online 03 July 2009.

Abstract 

Introduction

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) can be defined by the presence of unexplained breathing symptoms. However, validated questionnaires to comprehensively evaluate all dimensions of breathing symptoms proposed to be associated with DB have not been extensively developed. This paper discusses the development and exploration of the dimensionality of a preliminary questionnaire, the Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire, whose items were derived from a popular Internet questionnaire for evaluating breathing functionality and breathing symptoms proposed in the scientific literature to be discriminative for DB.

Method

The 17-item SEBQ was administered to 83 adults. Exploratory factor analysis was performed and correlations calculated between the SEBQ and the Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), which is a validated questionnaire for hyperventilation syndrome.

Results/Discussion

Two dimensions were found in the SEBQ. One dimension named “lack of air” appears to reflect sensations of air hunger that may relate more to chemoreceptor aspects of breathing sensation. The other dimension named “perception of inappropriate or restricted breathing” appears to reflect sensations and observations about the work of breathing and may relate more to the biomechanical aspects of breathing sensation. The correlations between the SEBQ and the NQ were .6 for the 17-item SEBQ and .3 for the final 12-item SEBQ which contained the strongest items of the two dimensions.

Conclusion

Breathing symptoms associated with dysfunctional breathing arising from predominately biomechanical aspects of breathing might be distinguishable from symptoms arising from factors reflecting chemoreceptor input. The two dimensions of the SEBQ may represent related but distinct aspects of dysfunctional breathing symptoms that appear different to those assessed by the Nijmegen Questionnaire. The SEBQ, if further developed, may be a useful clinical assessment tool that could more discriminatively evaluate the response of separate dimensions of breathing symptoms to treatments that aim to improve the functionality of breathing.

Keywords: Dysfunctional breathing, Breathing symptom questionnaire, Biomechanical breathing dysfunction, Dimensions of breathing sensation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1746-0689(09)00021-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2009.02.001

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 4 , Pages 121-127, December 2009