International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 137-141, December 2008

Clinical competence examination – Improvement of validity and reliability

  • Paula Fletcher

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +44 (0) 1622 671558; fax: +44 (0) 1622 662165.

European School of Osteopathy, Boxley House, The Street, Boxley, Maidstone, Kent ME14 3DZ, United Kingdom

Received 1 August 2008; accepted 26 August 2008.

Abstract 

The traditional approach to final clinical competence assessment has many shortcomings in terms of validity and reliability. Strategies for improving this traditional approach are presented, which include a degree of standardisation, coupled with increased variety. The advocacy of standardised or simulated patients by some researchers is discussed with the incorporation of patient feedback into the competence assessment mix. The relevance of examiner bias and the negative effects of being observed on candidate performance are considered, together with the significance of examiner training and the manner of their deployment. Consideration is given to alternative assessment modes with a concluding argument in favour of continuous assessment in place of the final examination.

Keywords: Clinical competence examination, Validity, Reliability, Measurement, Osteopathic medicine, Education

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1746-0689(08)00118-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2008.08.028

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 11, Issue 4 , Pages 137-141, December 2008