International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 7-15, March 2008

A short questionnaire to identify patient characteristics indicating improved compliance to exercise rehabilitation programs: A pilot investigation

  • David B. Howard

      Affiliations

    • Osteopathic Medicine Unit, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • ,
  • Cameron McR. Gosling

      Affiliations

    • Osteopathic Medicine Unit, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Centre for Ageing, Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Osteopathic Medicine Unit, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9919 1190; fax: +61 3 9919 1030.

Received 2 January 2007; received in revised form 2 December 2007; accepted 18 December 2007.

Abstract 

Background and objectives

Osteopaths and other health care practitioners are increasingly utilising exercise rehabilitation prescription (ERP) to complement manual therapy treatment regimens and augment the recovery of their patients. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between the level of patient compliance to ERP and recovery from a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. A problem facing osteopaths and other health care practitioners is the failure of patients to comply with ERP, which can impact on the successful recovery and rehabilitation of injuries. The aim of this study was to identify patient characteristics that influence compliance to ERP in an osteopathic student clinic.

Setting

Clinic of an Australian osteopathic training institution, where patients are treated by students under the supervision of clinical tutors.

Methods

A purposive sample of patients attending the Victoria University Osteopathic Medicine Clinic (VUOMC) was recruited over a three month period in 2006. The study population consisted of 200 patients aged 18 or over routinely attending the clinic, who volunteered to participate in response to verbal invitation from students or tutors. All consenting patients completed a pilot questionnaire developed by the researchers. The questionnaire assessed (1) patient attitudes, education and past experiences relating to health, sport and exercise, (2) whether the patient had received ERP and (3) compliance to the ERP.

Results

Seventy-three percent (146 respondents) of return patients were prescribed ERP and 27% (54 respondents) were not. Total compliance rate to ERP was 52% (76 respondents), with 48% (70 respondents) non-compliant. There was a significant difference between ‘attitude’ (P<0.001), ‘education’ (P<0.001) and ‘past experience’ (P<0.001) scores for the ERP compliant and non-compliant groups.

Conclusion

The overall ERP compliance rate of return patients at the VUOMC is comparable with previous studies. The findings of this study also suggest that patients who have a positive attitude, more education and more positive experiences in relation to health, sport and exercise are more likely to be compliant to practitioner prescribed exercise rehabilitation programs.

Keywords: Osteopathic Medicine, Exercise, Rehabilitation, Prescription, Compliance, Non-compliance, Attitude, Knowledge, Experience

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1746-0689(07)00087-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2007.12.002

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 7-15, March 2008