Reply to “The flawed cranial model”

References 

1. Hartman SE, Norton JM. Interexaminer reliability and cranial osteopathy. Sci Rev Altern Med. 2002;6:23–34
2. Hartman SE, Norton JM. Craniosacral therapy is not medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82:1146–1147
   • MEDLINE
3. Hartman SE, Norton JM. A review of King HH and Lay EM, “Osteopathy in the cranial field,” in Foundations for osteopathic medicine, 2nd ed. Sci Rev Altern Med. 2004–2005;8:24–28
4. Hartman SE. Should osteopathic licensing examinations test for knowledge of cranial osteopathy?. Int J Osteopath Med. 2005;8:153–154
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (73 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Hartman SE. Cranial osteopathy: Its fate seems clear. Chiropr Osteopat. 2006;14(10):<http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/14/1/10>
6. Zusne L, Jones WH. Anomalistic psychology: a study of magical thinking. 2nd ed.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988;p. 13–32
7. McDonald CJ, Mazzuca SA, McCabe GP. How much of the placebo “effect” is really statistical regression?. Stat Med. 1983;2:417–427
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Streiner DL. Regression toward the mean: its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Can J Psychiatry. 2001;46:72–76
   • MEDLINE
9. Beyerstein BL. Social and judgmental biases that make inert treatments seem to work. Sci Rev Altern Med. 1999;3:20–33