International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 75-76 , September 2006

Is osteopathy research relevant? A challenge has been made

  • Nicholas P. Lucas

      Affiliations

    • School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • Robert W. Moran

      Affiliations

    • School of Health Science, Unitec New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

References 

  1. Ernst E, Canter PH. A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:192–196
  2. Breen A, Vogel S, Pincus T, Foster N, Underwood M. Systematic review of spinal manipulation: a balanced review of evidence?. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:277
  3. Byfield D, McCarthy P. Systematic review of spinal manipulation: flaws in the review. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:277–278
  4. Lewis BJ, Carruthers G. Systematic review of spinal manipulation: a biased report. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:278
  5. Moore Ann, National Council for Osteopathic Research . Systematic review of spinal manipulation: including different techniques. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:277–279
  6. Gibbons P, Tehan P. Osteopathic medicine: validation of clinical practice by research. J Osteopath Educ Clin Res. 1997;7:10–18

PII: S1746-0689(06)00094-0

doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2006.07.005

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 3 , Pages 75-76 , September 2006

Article Tools