International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Page 36, March 2006

The effect of different rates of application of a rib raising technique on pain pressure threshold in asymptomatic individuals

  • Khali Williams

      Affiliations

    • Osteopathic Student, School of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Cameron Gosling

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Aging, Rehabilitation Exercise and Sport Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Rebecca Farthing

      Affiliations

    • Osteopathic Student, School of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Brett Vaughan

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Doncaster East, Melbourne, Australia

Introduction

Articulation or mobilisation is a commonly utilised treatment and diagnostic technique in osteopathic practice.1 Mobilisation techniques have previously been shown to produce a hypoalgesic response in association with sympathoexcitation, which can vary due to the rate of application.5 Rib raising (RR) is a form of articulation that has been previously investigated and shown to increase lung function in individuals with and without asthma.6 Its effects on pain measures are as yet unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine changes in pain pressure threshold after the application of a rib raising technique performed at two different rates.

Design

Randomised, controlled, crossover, prospective study.

Methods

Participants: Thirty asymptomatic volunteers recruited from the Victoria University student population.

Intervention: Each participant attended four sessions over four consecutive weeks and received a rapid RR treatment (2Hz), a slow RR treatment (0.5Hz), a control treatment or a placebo treatment in a randomised order.

Outcome Measures: Pain pressure threshold (PPT) was measured using a hand held algometer (Somedic, Sweden) and determined at the T4 spinous process level. Measures were calculated as % change from rest.

Results

PPT increases were observed in all groups (slow RR – 9.75% increase, rapid RR – 5.63% increase, control – 4.89% increase, placebo – 3.62%). A one-way ANOVA revealed there were no significant differences (P=0.437) between groups after application of the RR technique.

Conclusions

Slow application of an RR technique produces a greater increase in PPT in asymptomatic participants compared to all other treatment interventions although it was not significantly different.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1746-0689(06)00016-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2006.01.014

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Page 36, March 2006